On Friday 13 July 2012 09:57:49 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Friday 13 July 2012 09:30:44 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 13 de julho de 2012 08.33.42, Girish Ramakrishnan wrote: > > > Is this really important given that we are in feature freeze? Changes > > > to moc, however small, is not advisable at all. > > This is why we brought the subject on the mailing list. > > > As I wrote in the change, this breaks if there are overloads to the > > signal: > > > > signals: > > void somethingChanged(); > > void somethingChanged(int, QPrivateSignal); > > > > You can't connect to the private signal because the type QPrivateSignal is > > private. > > Yes that's right. > But signal overload should be avoided.
Maybe moc should even warn if the signal overload another function. -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - http://woboq.com _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
