Op 16-7-2012 23:52, Thiago Macieira schreef: > On segunda-feira, 16 de julho de 2012 21.34.10, André Pönitz wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:04:39AM +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>> Hello all >>> >>> I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we >>> should not apply them at this time. There are far too many chances >>> for breakage and it's a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze. >> I assume this is meant as a verdict, not as (possibly temporary) >> state of thinking. > Correct. The changes are the right thing to do, just not now. We'll have to > live with the current containers and their overhead until Qt 6. > > That includes the fact that QList<QVariant> is extremely inefficient. That being the case, would it be possible to at least document these issues properly then? I think it is not all that clear from the documentation that QList is so inefficient for these cases. I don't think documentation changes are binary incompatible ;-)
André _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development