On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:52:32PM -0700, ext Thiago Macieira wrote: > On segunda-feira, 16 de julho de 2012 21.34.10, André Pönitz wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 09:04:39AM +0300, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > I think that, despite the potential benefits of the changes, we > > > should not apply them at this time. There are far too many chances > > > for breakage and it's a blatant disrespect for the feature freeze. > > > > I assume this is meant as a verdict, not as (possibly temporary) > > state of thinking. > > Correct. The changes are the right thing to do, just not now. We'll have to > live with the current containers and their overhead until Qt 6. > > That includes the fact that QList<QVariant> is extremely inefficient. > this is absurd. we said A, now we need to say B. or "unsay" A, which i don't think anyone wants.
i for one don't believe in qt6 anytime soon. it's the do-never release qt5 was for years. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
