On 7/19/12 12:40 PM, "Knoll Lars (Nokia-MP/Oslo)" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On 6/29/12 11:37 PM, "ext Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> >wrote: > >>On quinta-feira, 28 de junho de 2012 23.53.51, [email protected] >>wrote: >>> Reassigning "declarative" back to qtquick1 could be done. I'm not sure >>>that >>> is an improvement since we have QtQuick 2 in the qtdeclarative module, >>>so >>> it actually becomes more confusing. >> >>And the Qt Quick 2 library is called QtDeclarative. How about we do a >>swap- >>around and rename the Qt Quick 1 library back to QtDeclarative (its API >>is >>QDeclarativeXXX anyway) and we rename the Qt Quick 2 library to >>libQtQuick2? > >The Qt Quick 2 lib is called libQtQuick, not QtDeclarative. We could >rename the old lib back, but I'm not sure it's worth it. Making QT += >declarative work and link against libQtQuick1 should be enough. > What do we want to do in the examples in that case? Can we there still use "QT += qtquick1"? For people that are new to Qt using "QT += declarative" might confuse them that they are using something that is not in the qtdeclarative folder (and that they are using an add-on instead of an essential, even though the name of the essential git repo is qtdeclarative) Casper _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
