On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > What do we want to do in the examples in that case? Can we there still use > "QT += qtquick1"?
I'm not sure how that is going to be less confusing. I'd say it's worse. QDeclarative* classes => old QML QT += declarative => old QML QQuick* classes => new QML QT += quick => new QML The only part that doesn't fit in that suggestion is the git repository name, which end-users aren't going to be exposed to. If you use "quick1", then you have to explain that, well no, actually, quick1 is the same as declarative in past Qt releases, but quick is really qtquick2, etc... _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
