Hi,
I'm developing a qt-based implementation of an OMG specification with
defines a number of
classes in different (nested) namespaces. I'd be nice to have the
implementation as close as possible
to the spec. For that purpose, headers would be included like:
#include <QtMyModule/Outernamespace/Innernamespace/QMyClass>
Module's .pro just defines headers in a dir structure that mimics namespaces:
TARGET = QtMyModule
HEADERS += \
Outernamespace/Innernamespace/qmyclass.h
SOURCES += \
Outernamespace/Innernamespace/qmyclass.cpp
So, the questions are :)
1) It seems there are no qt modules currently using nested namespaces.
Would that make
my module looks somehow non qt-ish ? It'd be nice if we could have a
more direct mapping
between spec and implementation.
2) Provided nested namespaces are fine, how do I instruct syncqt to
generate iheaders
preserving original sources dir structure ? Currently iheaders are all
generated in qtbase/
include/QtMyModule/, regardless their original place in source's dir
structure. I have no
INSTALLS directives in my .pro file.
Thanks in advance,
--
Sandro
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
