Hi there, any suggestion about that ? Thanks, -- Sandro
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sandro Andrade <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm developing a qt-based implementation of an OMG specification with > defines a number of > classes in different (nested) namespaces. I'd be nice to have the > implementation as close as possible > to the spec. For that purpose, headers would be included like: > > #include <QtMyModule/Outernamespace/Innernamespace/QMyClass> > > Module's .pro just defines headers in a dir structure that mimics namespaces: > > TARGET = QtMyModule > > HEADERS += \ > Outernamespace/Innernamespace/qmyclass.h > > SOURCES += \ > Outernamespace/Innernamespace/qmyclass.cpp > > So, the questions are :) > > 1) It seems there are no qt modules currently using nested namespaces. > Would that make > my module looks somehow non qt-ish ? It'd be nice if we could have a > more direct mapping > between spec and implementation. > > 2) Provided nested namespaces are fine, how do I instruct syncqt to > generate iheaders > preserving original sources dir structure ? Currently iheaders are all > generated in qtbase/ > include/QtMyModule/, regardless their original place in source's dir > structure. I have no > INSTALLS directives in my .pro file. > > Thanks in advance, > -- > Sandro _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
