2012/10/4 Rafael Roquetto <[email protected]> > Basically what you are doing is telling everyone there is no further > discussion. > > My point is, it is not about leaving the users without the given changes. > On > the contrary, I even suggested that yet another super critical patch gets > included (SSL), even though this means we are deviating from the standard > release workflow. The main goal here is to benefit the users. As I said > before, it's an excepcional case, but there is still the wrong way and the > right way. The right way is naming it 4.8.4. > +1
-- *Please don't ask where I come from, It's a shame!* Best Regards Yuchen
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
