On Friday, October 05, 2012 08:11:25 Turunen Tuukka wrote: > On 4.10.2012 17.42, "Rafael Roquetto" <[email protected]> wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 01:11:19PM +0000, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > >> My preference is towards releasing now and making proper 4.8.4 (with > >> > >>more > >> > >> content) later. It is true that getting the security fix in is also > >> valuable and then we certainly need to call it 4.8.4. > > > >And what do you think about going down that road, instead? As suggested, > >you do not need to do the full release cycle. Would that work? I think > >that > >would make everyone happy. > > It is true that there are many value adding improvements pending in the > 4.8 branch - over 80 since 4.8.3. > > So we will not release 4.8.3-1 with the new copyrights and MinGW fix as > advised by many of you. > > We will start work to make 4.8.4, which we should then be able to release > in about two weeks. We will do that according to the defined release > process of 4.8 in order not to cause confusion and reduce risk of > regressions. > > Yours, > > Tuukka
Thanks for that, -- Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions ** Qt Developer Conference: http://qtconference.kdab.com/ **
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
