04.12.2012, 21:02, "Pau Garcia i Quiles" <pgqui...@elpauer.org>: > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > >> There's no point in keeping separate branch purely for tags. It is just an >> unnecessary overcomplication. > Actually, there is: it allows you to continue working in stabilization > branches, then discard those changes (i. e. never release them into master or > the -releases branch)
This is something you are supposed to do in topic branches, forked from stabilization branch. Also, you have git revert for extreme cases. >and it helps overcome the lack of git tags support in some continuous >integration systems. Sounds weird, like it was continuous integration system without support for branches. -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
