On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:37 PM, Thiago A. Corrêa <[email protected]>wrote:
> Oh, I thought it was discussed previously, but since you mentioned, > baudRate would be nicer. Yes, I had proposed it back then to Denis iirc, so we did discuss it. Cannot recall whether Denis did not like the idea or we were lazy buggers to implement it. :-) By the way, I am not sure I understand the proposal yet fully. I tend to think that "BaudRate" is better for the enumeration type name, but I would not suggest that for the concrete values. I would personally prefer "Baud9600", and so forth for those. What do you think? Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
