On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:53:27PM +0000, Sorvig Morten wrote: > On Jan 29, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen > <[email protected]> wrote: > > just stick to the request above. if we made an exception for > > everyone who wants a different procedure, we won't get anywhere - do > > you have any idea *how* many dead changes there are? > > No, and that's my point : I don't really care how many changes others > have. I'll deregister myself from those I'm not interested in. > all changes i'm subscribed to are somehow interesting to me, obviously. that means that i don't want to unsubscribe, as i'd miss any relevant activity. therefore they should be abandoned if they are dead, rather than having everyone remove themselves (and in the worst case spam all other subscribers with a request to be re-invited).
> Can you elaborate a bit on what practical issue this would solve? > (beyond "there are many changes in gerrit"). > apart from the above, it also skews the metrics (in case somebody ever decides to use the number of open changes for something). also, the matter is not up for discussion: the cleanup of dead changes was decided before we launched. i'm just executing. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
