Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > No, and that's my point : I don't really care how many changes others > > have. I'll deregister myself from those I'm not interested in. > > > all changes i'm subscribed to are somehow interesting to me, obviously. > that means that i don't want to unsubscribe, as i'd miss any relevant > activity. therefore they should be abandoned if they are dead, rather > than having everyone remove themselves (and in the worst case spam all > other subscribers with a request to be re-invited). > > > Can you elaborate a bit on what practical issue this would solve? > > (beyond "there are many changes in gerrit"). > > > apart from the above, it also skews the metrics (in case somebody ever > decides to use the number of open changes for something). > > also, the matter is not up for discussion: the cleanup of dead changes > was decided before we launched. i'm just executing.
Than this decision should be revised. My dashboard still fits a screen, even with a few old items in it. If yours doesn't and you don't like that (I wouldn't...) unsubscribe yourself. Destroying other people's work is not an option. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
