Hi Oswald and others Though I clearly understand the reason, I don't like the idea. It is not that I have a problem with writing 'do not abandon' on my own old changes. My main concern is that we have had contributers who left the community and they have left their patches.
Some of these patches just needs to be shined a bit up and then they are ready to be put into Qt. I was actually planning to write a mail on this list on what we were going to do with them (ie how to find the onces that had value). However a regular and automatic abandon is not the strategy that I hoped for. It will merely waste the work and make it impossible to find any old useful patches. At the very least it would be nice to be able to locate which patches was automatically abandoned (preferably in gerrit). Regards Thorbjørn On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen < [email protected]> wrote: > moin *, > > 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. > seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. > therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which > haven't seen activity for a long time a honest look. > please explicitly mark the ones you still want to work on by adding a > comment. everything which has no indication of (planned) activity in a > few weeks will be abandoned by administrative action. > if you are an ex-troll/-nokian, please also check the dashboard of your > alter ego. > if you are a maintainer, give identified drive-by contributors a ping. > i'd also like to encourage everyone to adopt orphaned changes they have > an interest in. > > regards > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
