On terça-feira, 29 de janeiro de 2013 19.47.11, Peter Kümmel wrote: > On 29.01.2013 13:05, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > moin *, > > > > 5.0 is out and the 5.1 feature freeze isn't that far off any more. > > seems like the best time for some serious house cleaning. > > therefore i'd like to urge everyone to give their pending changes which > > haven't seen activity for a long time a honest look. > > please explicitly mark the ones you still want to work on by adding a > > comment. everything which has no indication of (planned) activity in a > > few weeks will be abandoned by administrative action. > > if you are an ex-troll/-nokian, please also check the dashboard of your > > alter ego. > > if you are a maintainer, give identified drive-by contributors a ping. > > i'd also like to encourage everyone to adopt orphaned changes they have > > an interest in. > > What about WIP changes? Could they stay open? > It is obvious that they don't need a review.
You can't tell apart a real work-in-progress (but not progressed in months) from an effectively abandoned WIP. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
