On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 01:08:11PM +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:58:13AM +0000, Rutledge Shawn wrote: > > I question your right to unilaterally decide to put the kibosh on > > other people's patches, automatically, across the whole project, even > > when they are not on your own review list. > > > as i stated before, i'm driving forward a process to decide the > execution details of a previously made decision.
I am asking for reconsideration, in the current context, with people currently involved. > > You've had enough feedback from others too about _that_ idea. > > > so how many people was it? two? three? sorry, not relevant with the > arguments given. As far as I can see approximately half, if not even the majority of people who responded opposed the move. Declaring the result as "consensus" _for_ the move seems a bit of a stretch. I don't think you properly rebutted any of the arguments. I have not seen any reasoning beyond "I ignore what you say" why abandoning any change that is _not_ on your dashboard would help to solve the problem you have with the size of your dashboard. I have not seen any reasoning how an automated process can help you to weed out items that _are_ on your dashboard when - as you claim - you have an interest in all of them and feel unable to make a an educated guess from which ones you can unsubscribe yourself. In case you want to make a point that there are in general too many changes in a somewhat dubious state on gerrit and you would appreciate the help of every contributor to improve the situation by having a look at his changes and abandon the hopeless ones we might want to ask someone from the doc team to help to formulate that suggestion. They have a passion for finding the right words to make complex issues easy to understand. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development