We use the following repository for the code coverage statistic: http://qt.gitorious.org/qtsdk
And we compute only the code coverage from QtBase. The reason is that we plan to cover all Qt modules in the future. So the 'master' branch is not the 'master' branch from QtBase, but from QtSdk repository. I agree that due to the fact that only one module is covered, it is a little bit confusing. Am 01.02.2013 um 10:52 schrieb Sergio Ahumada <[email protected]>: > On 02/01/2013 10:45 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On sexta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2013 07.11.13, Sébastien Fricker wrote: >>> Hi, >>> the Qt5 code coverage report is displaying now the code coverage report of >>> the modifications since Qt5.0.0. >> >> Thanks for the report! >> >>> So for QtBase 3 reports are now online: >>> The actual coverage report of the master branch (computed on a daily basis) >>> The code coverage of Qt5.0.0 (never updated) >>> The code coverage of the difference between master and qt5.0.0 (computed on >>> a daily basis) >> >> Uhh... there is no master branch. If you're actually using master, you have a >> tree that is several months old and not getting updates. >> >> Did you mean dev, stable or releases? >> > > I asked him the same some time ago .. I think that we meant 'master' > branch of qtsdk.git .. which points to qt<module>#release > > I'll let Sebastian to confirm. > > Cheers, > -- > Sergio Ahumada > Release Engineer - Digia, Qt > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
