I have added a summary of your suggestion in the froglogic forum: http://www.froglogic.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=430&start=0
You can add your comments here. Just note, that all messages are going to the moderation queue to avoid spams. Am 01.02.2013 um 12:04 schrieb Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>: > On sexta-feira, 1 de fevereiro de 2013 11.26.20, Sébastien Fricker wrote: >>> qtsdk master doesn't make sense for daily reports because it only moves >>> during release times. It would need to be the qt5.git repository and we >>> go back to a choice of the three branches. >> >> So you would prefer to track the coverage of the dev branch of each module? > > Yes, I would prefer coverage on dev, which is where development is happening > and where, potentially, new code without enough coverage could be merged in. > > Tracking stable would work too, for now. Maybe not in the future. > > Tracking releases is not useful. By the time we get any reports, it's too > late. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
