On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Knoll Lars <[email protected]> wrote: > Alan has been very proactive and is probably the best person we have for the > job right now. So a +1 from my side. > > But the declarative repo is pretty big and very central to Qt moving forward. > So I believe we will need to split up responsibilities further in the longer > term. I would at the minimum like to split up on a per module basis, maybe > even a bit more fine-grained. So one Maintainer for Qt QML, one for Qt Quick, > etc.
Agreed, QtQml and QtQuick are both separate modules that are full 'module' sized. As development ramps back up I hope we can find at least one maintainer per module (which is more important than maintainers 'per repository'). > Finally, we also need to ask the person in question: Alan, are you willing to > take that role, and will your responsibilities in you day job leave you with > enough time to act as the maintainer? Yes, I'm willing to take that role. As you might have noticed, a significant part of my day job is working on QML already and my manager is supportive of my spending more time on it to fulfill the maintainer duties. -- Alan Alpert _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
