+1 Alan has done a lot of good stuff for QML so far. Looking forward to more good stuff coming :)
cheers, GUnnar On Feb 4, 2013, at 6:28 PM, Alan Alpert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Knoll Lars <[email protected]> wrote: >> Alan has been very proactive and is probably the best person we have for the >> job right now. So a +1 from my side. >> >> But the declarative repo is pretty big and very central to Qt moving >> forward. So I believe we will need to split up responsibilities further in >> the longer term. I would at the minimum like to split up on a per module >> basis, maybe even a bit more fine-grained. So one Maintainer for Qt QML, one >> for Qt Quick, etc. > > Agreed, QtQml and QtQuick are both separate modules that are full > 'module' sized. As development ramps back up I hope we can find at > least one maintainer per module (which is more important than > maintainers 'per repository'). > >> Finally, we also need to ask the person in question: Alan, are you willing >> to take that role, and will your responsibilities in you day job leave you >> with enough time to act as the maintainer? > > Yes, I'm willing to take that role. As you might have noticed, a > significant part of my day job is working on QML already and my > manager is supportive of my spending more time on it to fulfill the > maintainer duties. > > -- > Alan Alpert > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
