On Friday 1. February 2013 14.34.26 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > But if we automate this the timeout period needs to be long enough. > > 2-3 months is certainly too short, we need to be conservative with > > these kinds of automatisms. A year sounds more reasonable. > > > > > > i don't think this makes sense. i'd rather have a bot post a gentle ping > after the proposed 3-month timeout, and then follow through within a few > (four?) weeks.
Hi, That is a bit destructive. The change would be updated and filters would not work correctly. It is better to close them immediately, if you really need to. Cheers, Jędrek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
