On Friday 15 February 2013 11:43:10 Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Friday, February 15, 2013 12:28:32 Timo Jyrinki wrote: > > At least qtpim, qtsystems, qtconnectivity, qtfeedback > > and qtwayland will follow later, and I'll be filing change proposals > > for them at that time as part of the process. > > I don't know why you're packaging those. > > You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right? > > And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will > likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be > part of a Qt release?
AFAIK, QtWayland is planned to be part of Qt 5.1. (Parts of the module will be marked as experimental.) - Paul _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
