On Monday, February 18, 2013 05:07:42 Lorn Potter wrote: > On 15/02/13 20:43, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > I don't know why you're packaging those. > > > > You understand that they are not 'part of Qt 5', right? > > They are part of Qt, as in Qt Project.
Being hosted on qt-project.org does not make them 'part of Qt', no. What is 'part of Qt' is what we tag and release together. Not being part of a Qt release means not being 'part of Qt'. Anything else will only create confusion. > They just aren't part of the Qt > 5.0 release package. Big difference. > > > And you understand that they are not stable in any way and their API will > > likely change, and they will not be part of Qt 5.1, and they may never be > > part of a Qt release? > > They are stable. Some of them even have active maintainers. But they don't have releases, and therefore binary incompatible changes can still be made without concern. Thanks, -- Stephen Kelly <stephen.ke...@kdab.com> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
