On terça-feira, 12 de março de 2013 13.41.33, Shaw Andy wrote: > I would expect that the workflow is that if a report is set to be "In > progress" then this is the indication that someone is actually working on > the report, if we start using the assigner for this indication then it > sounds like it will complicate matters even further. Also, if a P1 is > created and it is unassigned, who is responsible for ensuring that gets > picked up and processed?
Assigned means that someone is responsible for the bug. In progress means that someone is working on the bug. A bug might be assigned for other reasons than fixing it, like triaging, writing a testcase, etc. To be honest, I don't care if a bug is auto-assigned upon creation or not. All bugs need to be triaged, so whichever workflow we decide on must support that. Right now, as maintainer for QtCore, I either triage myself the bugs I receive (including the ones I have watches upon) or I assign to someone to give me input. And we need to do it consistently: either all bugs are auto-assigned upon creation or they're not. Right now, there are several components that have a default assignee and several that don't. For example, most of the Core: Event system bugs that I receive and reassign to GUI: Window management become Unassigned. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
