On domingo, 24 de março de 2013 23.43.31, Mark wrote: > On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Thiago Macieira > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On domingo, 24 de março de 2013 22.47.03, Mark wrote: > >> That made me wonder, is there a way to change IO backends in Qt? > >> Because if i could swap the current Qt IO backend with KIO then i can > >> use those classes just as they are. That sounds like a very appealing > >> thing to have. > >> > >> Is there a "QPA" for the IO part in Qt? > > > > No, Qt has no QPA for I/O. > > Clear. > But then the question becomes: > - Would it be desirable to have such an QPA?
Yes. David is working on making KIO work with fewer dependencies, so more Qt applications are going to use it. > - Even if the QPA is there, would that be useful for KIO? Or is KIO > such a big beast that no QPA is good enough? That "QPA" would be KIO itself. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
