On 3/25/13 7:13 PM, "Laszlo Papp" <[email protected]> wrote: >> qtx11extras and qtserialport didn't need a merge, since they didn't have >dev/stable branches. > >We got that sorted out a couple of days ago, but it does not require any >work for the moment as stable got branched off master. Then, we just >began to follow the Qt branching model. > > >On 25 March 2013 15:30, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50 <tel:2013%2010.46.50>, >>Sergio Ahumada wrote: >>> Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, >>> qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. >> >> Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or is it ok >>to drop >> them from beta (after alpha) if we find we don't actually want to >>release them, >> for whatever reason? > > > > >QtSerialPort has already been reviewed on this mailing list, but I would >personally encourage everyone to take a (yet another) look at it if you >have time. Thank you.
Yes, Qt Serialport has seen some reviews, so while more eyes won't hurt, I feel comfortable with it as is as well. Qt Quick Controls has also seen some reviews, so I believe we're now mostly in a situation where we need people to test (ie. have it as part of a beta) to fine tune things. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
