On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 17.05.12, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Mandag 25. mars 2013 08.30.45 skrev Thiago Macieira: > > On segunda-feira, 25 de março de 2013 10.46.50, Sergio Ahumada wrote: > > > Next step is to get qt5.git updated and add qtquickcontrols, qtsensors, > > > qtserialport and qtx11extras to it. > > > > Shouldn't we do an API review on those before we add them? Or is it ok to > > drop them from beta (after alpha) if we find we don't actually want to > > release them, for whatever reason? > > For the qtquickcontrols we have been reviewing the API as much as possible > in the team working on them in Digia. Of course we'd like to get more > feedback, please go ahead with a review. > > This is an interesting question though, how do we make an API review for a > module? On the mailing list is most likely not the most efficient way.
I simply asked to be sure that the review was done with someone experienced. I think it's fine if two (or more) people who can meet each other other face to face do it that way. Think of it as a clean bill of health. I'd like to see the same from QA, that the level of unit testing is acceptable. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
