Why not #qt-qml for the merged channel? I use the term "QML" more than
"QtQuick" in this context.

I agree about having one channel though.


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Nurmi J-P <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose merging the current #qt-qml and #qt-components IRC
> channels to a single channel called #qt-quick.
>
> Reasons:
> - the #qt-components name is outdated now that we have QtQuick Controls
> - most users don't understand the distinction between QML, QtQuick and
> QtQuick Controls.
>
> I believe this would make it easier for new users to find the correct
> channel. We would also setup automatic redirects from the old channels so
> the naming would be more or less transparent to the current users. Thoughts?
>
> --
> J-P Nurmi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to