On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Alan Alpert <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Alan Alpert <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> I like the idea. For the average user, I definitely think #qt-quick is > >> a better name. It has a much clearer association, due to users > >> importing QtQuick and QtQuick.Controls in every file. > > > > > > OK, so you want a QtQuick channel, not QML, so dealing with the C++ API > as > > well, et cetera. I did not get that intention from the initial mail, but > > then it is fine. By the way, it is slower to type as it is a few > characters > > more ... ;) :) > > The C++ API does (and has) come up occasionally, even in #qt-qml. But > realistically most people use the QML APIs (especially for > QtQuick.Controls ;) ). > > Size doesn't matter, as everyone should auto-join it :P . > > >> > >> And non-quick QML users won't get lost as badly (I once saw a Cascades > >> user in > >> #qt-qml, and no-one could help him :( . #qt-qnx is a better channel > >> for Cascades-QML > > > > > > Actually, I think #blackberrydev is even better as Cascades-QML is more > > Blackberry specific rather than upstream Qt. My practical experience > shows > > that, too. > > Ah, I'm only on #qt-qnx. > > >> > >> I would like to have a separate #qt-qml channel for the language > >> issues (which are more working on the language than working with > >> anyways), but that's not realistic because users can't always tell the > >> difference. So maybe once the new #qt-quick channel is fully > >> established and #qt-qml is empty, we can reclaim it. Or the > >> language/engine development channel can have a more technical name to > >> hide it from the average user. That second channel is less important, > >> so it can wait for a later discussion, and QML language development > >> chat can always go to #qt-labs until then. > > > > > > Yes, that is what I wanted to raise as well, #qt-labs is fine for now > IMHO, > > I agree. > > PS: Perhaps you meant reply-all? > Yes, I did. Apologies. I am still struggling with the new gmail interface at times. ;-) Cheers, Laszlo
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
