Re: [Development] Cherry picking to replace a change set

[Oswald Buddenhagen]

On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 03:08:56PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Of course, each commit must stand on its own and be self-contained (it has to 
> compile and should hopefully pass all tests). If you have to choose between 
> atomicity and self-containment, prefer self-containment.
> 
atomicity implies self-containment. it goes both ways. you can submit
neither quarks nor molecules.
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Commit_Policy 8.1 is pretty clear on that.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development