On terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2013 11:42:04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > you did, however, make no effort to substantiate your position. > an argument against your interpretation is for example bisectability. > also, it's just plain illogical to tear apart an allegedly "too complex" > change, because then assessing the pieces requires adding "external" > context. which is just a less handy way to review one big change.
I've made it clear that I prefer reviewability (now and in the future) over compilability, in extreme cases. It's an opinion. As such, it does not have to be substantiated. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
