On terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2013 11:47:33, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Why not use std::unique_ptr instead in the cases where the patch has an 
> effect?

We cannot. All uses of std::unique_ptr inside Qt are automatic -2.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to