On Tuesday 03 September 2013 09:33:50 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 3 de setembro de 2013 11:47:33, Stephen Kelly wrote: > > Why not use std::unique_ptr instead in the cases where the patch has an > > effect? > > We cannot. All uses of std::unique_ptr inside Qt are automatic -2.
You cannot use the new QScopedPointer feature either, since it requires C++11 which is also a -2 in Qt atm. Bye PS: I for one, am all in favor of removing move semantics from QScopedPointer. -- Milian Wolff [email protected] http://milianw.de _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
