On Thursday 26 September 2013 09:42:01 Thiago Macieira wrote: > On quinta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2013 11:31:07, Lisandro Damián Nicanor > > Pérez Meyer wrote: > > This means that if Qt ships a minified javascript library, a Debian > > maintainer should either: > > > > a) Repack the source tarball without the minified javascript libs and use > > the system provided ones prior to start the building process. > > > > b) Repack the source tarball to include the unminified javascript libs and > > either minify them upon build time or use them unminified (after all, they > > are mostly used in examples). > > > > c) Upon proper configuration (like ./configure --use-system-js), use the > > system lib to provide the (un)minified js. > > Since we wouldn't be modifying the libraries, we'd just be passing them > through, can we have option d: > > d) Ship the libraries unmodified from upstream and include a link to where > they were obtained and where to obtain the non-minified sources. > > Or is that not acceptable as per our own licensing? That is, since we're > shipping our sources as LGPLv2.1, do we need to ship the 3rdparty JS > libraries we use in their preferred form for modification?
webkit-fancybrowser-jquery-qrc.html and webkit-fancybrowser-jquery-min-js.html contain a copy of the minified jquery. As the best of my knowledge, this are GFDL-NIV licensed (please correct me if I am wrong). > PS: examples are licensed BSD. So shipping then minified should not be a problem for Qt, at least in the example's case. And also in the best of my knowledge. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
