On Thursday 26 September 2013 15:07:28 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > On Thursday 26 September 2013 09:42:01 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quinta-feira, 26 de setembro de 2013 11:31:07, Lisandro Damián Nicanor > > > > Pérez Meyer wrote: > > > This means that if Qt ships a minified javascript library, a Debian > > > maintainer should either: > > > > > > a) Repack the source tarball without the minified javascript libs and > > > use > > > the system provided ones prior to start the building process. > > > > > > b) Repack the source tarball to include the unminified javascript libs > > > and > > > either minify them upon build time or use them unminified (after all, > > > they > > > are mostly used in examples). > > > > > > c) Upon proper configuration (like ./configure --use-system-js), use the > > > system lib to provide the (un)minified js. > > > > Since we wouldn't be modifying the libraries, we'd just be passing them > > > > through, can we have option d: > > d) Ship the libraries unmodified from upstream and include a link to > > where > > > > they were obtained and where to obtain the non-minified sources. > > > > Or is that not acceptable as per our own licensing? That is, since we're > > shipping our sources as LGPLv2.1, do we need to ship the 3rdparty JS > > libraries we use in their preferred form for modification? > > webkit-fancybrowser-jquery-qrc.html and > webkit-fancybrowser-jquery-min-js.html contain a copy of the minified > jquery. As the best of my knowledge, this are GFDL-NIV licensed (please > correct me if I am wrong). >
qt4's tests/benchmarks/script/sunspider/tests/string-unpack-code.js also seems to contain minified js, but I don't know for sure the license of that code. -- Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
