Thanks, if so, case closed, the Ubuntu users will have to wait for
Canonical's patches and the users testing the versions of Qt from Qt's
website are likely to file false bugs in the future, so I'd vouch for
including Canonical's patches into upstream Qt to avoid this issue and
possible future false bug reports.
But since Canonical is taking a certain stance on certain issues (including
Mir) I understand why Canonical's patches might not be welcome upstream.


On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Keith Gardner <[email protected]> wrote:

> It looks like they are trying to create their own QPA plugin for Qt5.  For
> the appmenu changes, they reference the changes they made to the Qt4 source
> code and are porting to a Qt5 QPA plugin.  I would assume that changes for
> the system tray icon would also be included in the plugin.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/appmenu-qt/+bug/1157213
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Jiergir Ogoerg <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I see, you guys don't have time (motivation or whatever) to look closer
>> into this issue. At least I tried.
>>
>> As to Ubuntu's popularity - I don't like Canonical nor Ubuntu - but I
>> have to use it cause it sucks less than other distros I tried out and
>> regardless
>> of the platitudes about "popularity" we can get into - it's clear that
>> Ubuntu is so popular that Qt's devs shouldn't leave this issue
>> uninvestigated, since
>> the source code for Ubuntu's Qt4 version is open source and available you
>> guys could check if you wanted.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thiago Macieira <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On segunda-feira, 14 de outubro de 2013 18:55:56, Jiergir Ogoerg wrote:
>>> > To test qt4 I did "sudo apt-get install libqt4-dev", that is, the libs
>>> that
>>> > come with Ubuntu. I'm not a Qt developer so I hope you guys figure out
>>> why
>>> > (Ubuntu's) Qt4 works and (the offline version of) Qt5.2 beta doesn't.
>>> Since
>>> > Ubuntu is the most popular distro I would guess it's worth spending
>>> some
>>> > time investigating this issue, I'm just a Qt user so I don't know how
>>> Qt
>>> > works underneath.
>>>
>>> If they patch Qt, we can't do much.
>>>
>>> I hope their packagers are around the mailing list to answer.
>>>
>>> PS: Ubuntu being the most popular depends on your criteria for defining
>>> what
>>> "popular" means.
>>> --
>>> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
>>>   Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Development mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to