On terça-feira, 22 de outubro de 2013 11:39:30, Pau Garcia i Quiles wrote: > What about dlopen/dlsym?
I hate that option. I hate where we use it and I'd rather we didn't. In particular, since we're trying to locate one of two major versions, we need to try first the .so.1 version and, if that fails, try the so.0 version, and if that fails, have a fallback path to fail gracefully with. No, let's just link statically. The library isn't big and its license is not a problem for neither the Open Source packages nor the commercial ones (Digia supplies the sources to the commercial customers, so there's no problem with the relinking clause of libudev's LGPLv2 license). Just one note: we need to ensure that libudev.a was compiled with -fPIC. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
