On quinta-feira, 24 de outubro de 2013 13:33:10, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > the lgpl does not limit how *we* can build and distribute our packages, > because we ship the sources anyway. > the ones who'd have a problem would be our customers. > > but why is everyone talking about static linking, anyway? the decision > to ship a copy of the library, and the way it is linked, are orthogonal. > QtAngle demonstrates how to make a fully dynamic version. > QtZlib shows how to fake it.
And we're doing it to ICU too. So maybe the simplest is to just include one of the two versions of a dynamic libudev with the packages. Provided, of course, that libudev works with either version of the daemon. (If it doesn't, I can quote Linus to Lennart about it) PS: IMO, QtZlib is a good example of what not to do... -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
