On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 13:21:15, Alan Alpert wrote: > The * is for some interesting things I noticed. Of the 3 usages, 2 of > them were after Thiago's original email. Which means that if he had > run the script on QtDeclarative as well, he'd have gotten only 1 hit. > 2 of them had the wrong module name, and 1 of them was arguably > ineligible (but I'm still following that up). So there's still quite > the manual pass needed, even if [ChangeLog] adoption picks up.
I ran the script on all submodules of qt5.git that produced any listing for "git rev-list v5.1.1..origin/release". That is: the module had to be tagged for 5.1.1. That means the script did not catch modules that are getting the first release now. I did a little rearranging of the entries after I ran the script, but not much. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
