On segunda-feira, 25 de novembro de 2013 14:49:43, Alan Alpert wrote: > My apologies, I did not notice. That raises two questions: > > 1) Should the qtbase changelog contain all changes from essential > modules, or just the ones in the qtbase repository? i.e. should I > merge the qtdeclarative changelog into it once that gets approved.
Hmm... looks like there are changelogs in each repository. I somehow missed all that. My mistake. We should continue to have per-module changelogs. > 2) What to do about that one which was integrated? Remove since it's > now duplicated in the qtdeclarative changelog, or fix that it is under > the wrong module? We should fix qtbase. I'll also adapt the script not to do a per-repository scan, as opposed to a "git submodule foreach" scan. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
