On 02.01.14 08:42, "Simon Hausmann" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Thursday 2. January 2014 09.34.21 Konstantin Ritt wrote: >> 1. In cpp, we typically use enums for numeric constants. In Qt coding >> style, enums are in CamelCase. >> 2. Just a wasting of time. Simply use generated documentation rather >>than >> scroll over the header files (Qt docs are very good, you know). > >I also think that it's going to be difficult to get buy-in for moving >functions >around. I think it adds little value (in the light of IDE based >navigation) >and lots of noise in the git history. And reordering virtual functions would break BC. Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
