When I want to find a C++ function, I search for "::functionName"
I feel so old. Wait... I'll be 64 this month. I remember when I first heard the Beatles sing "When I'm 64." I thought I would never be 64 years old. But now here I am, still using old reliable ctrl-s to find functions. martin ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of André Somers [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Development] Coding style proposal Poenitz Andre schreef op 3-1-2014 12:33: > André Somers wrote: >> Poenitz Andre schreef op 2-1-2014 23:49: >>> Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: >>>> Ironically, not even the IDE (QtCreator) sorts them out, in my example >>>> parse...() is the 1st in the list, and locale() is the last one (16th). >>> There's a "Sort alphabetically" check box in the context menu of >>> whatever-that-combobox-that-I-never-use-for-navigation-is-called. >> Well, that's a find! I wonder why it is not enabled by default? > Probably because the current code follows the rule of "Don't switch on > a fancy option by default unless it's clearly better than the alternative", > and I even tend to agree that the rule applies here, and the current default > is good. But since I don't use the combobox at all, that's not a strong > opinion. > > If people who actually use the combobox agree that alphabetical order > should take precedence over the order in which the functions are defined, > the default can be changed. A patch is now on Gerrit (#74614) and awaits > comments. I hardly used it _because_ it was still such a hassle to find anything in it in a larger file. That might certainly change now... André _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
