On Jan 6, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Marc Mutz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 02 January 2014 21:04:27 Jiergir Ogoerg wrote: >> buffer() // getter >> buffer_set(..) // setter >> BufferSupportsFind() // bool >> >> selection() // getter >> SelectionMove(..) // move selection >> selection_set(..) // setter >> SelectionUnset(...) // unset something > > You might find the std policy of having the same name for getter and setter > (differing in constness and argument count) interesting, then: > > off_t pos = buffer.pos(); > buffer.pos(pos + 1);
Urgs, so sacrificing sensible/natural method names for the sake of having property-related methods next to each other when they are alphabetically sorted? Btw, in Qt Creator’s locator you get all buffer/setBuffer/hasBuffer/isBufferEnabled methods when you type just “. buffer” ;) -- Eike Ziller, Senior Software Engineer - Digia, Qt Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Tuula Haataja Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
