Em qua 05 fev 2014, às 10:37:27, Robert Knight escreveu: > > The idea was to silently return a default-constructed type. > > I'm not keen on that. Aside from adding extra restrictions to the > types that the class can be used with as you mention, > it runs the much more severe risk of masking serious bugs.
No way around it if we exclude exceptions. We need to return something. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
