On 11 Feb 2014, at 19:14, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Em ter 11 fev 2014, às 16:26:44, Tony Van Eerd escreveu: >> http://channel9.msdn.com/Events/GoingNative/2013/rand-Considered-Harmful > > No doubt. And we should have a more secure generator, at least until we can > rely on std::random. We can always 'duplicate' some code from the std::random library :-) How 'secure' should this be? Is a Mersenne-Twister for instance 'secure' enough? > > Anyone up for creating a nice function for Qt 5.4? > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
