Em qua 12 fev 2014, às 08:01:23, Kurt Pattyn escreveu:
> We can always 'duplicate' some code from the std::random library
> How 'secure' should this be? Is a Mersenne-Twister for instance 'secure'
> enough?

As secure as we can get it. We should use the CPU instructions and/or 
/dev/random whenever possible.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to