Hi, >- Have an "API review board", and for
A review board would indeed be a good thing to have, not necessarily restricted to API reviews only. The problem also currently is that reviewers are distracted by a lot of mundane things (check for compilation, compiler warnings, check indentation style, style issues, check for potential performance issues, messages, spelling, functionality smoke testing, checking autotests...), potentially over quite a few review rounds. If there was a review board (supported by more automated testing) making sure each change passes all those criteria before a developer gets to see it, it would be a lot easier to focus on the API. Friedemann -- Friedemann Kleint Digia, Qt _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
