On Wed, 26 Feb 2014 07:40:31 -0800, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> Em qua 26 fev 2014, ?s 12:18:41, Kevin Krammer escreveu: > > On Tuesday, 2014-02-25, 09:00:21, Wolfgang Baron wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I read somewhere, that there are plans for a pure-Qt QtDBus (not using > > > dbus-1) implementation in Qt-5.3, which would run on all platforms > > > (including mswindows). > > > > QtDBus already works on Windows. > > As far as I know it is just not built by default. > > That is true. I know it works, I have been using it for years now. Having to compile my own Qt binaries all the time is just very annoying, so I am looking forward to a compiled QtDBus in the official Windows binaries. > And one of the reasons why it isn't built by default is the lack > of libdbus-1 headers on Windows systems. Once we no longer depend on > libdbus-1, QtDBus will be enabled by default on all platforms. I don't understand the problem. The freedesktop.org headers work nicely. Their license should not be the problem either. You could leave compiling the dbus binaries to the customer (it's a breeze). Are there any other reasons? Kind regards, Wolfgang Baron _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
