On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 01:37:33PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em dom 27 abr 2014, às 12:55:58, Peter Kümmel escreveu: > > Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection of > > QML for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui > > nobody would have complained. > > We'd end up with one of the problems of CSS which is that you can't do > calculations in the bindings. I can't do > > width: 50% - 10em > > The moment you start adding some math, you need stuff like Math.random() and > you end up again in JS.
Not true. Some (basic) math fits the "declarative" needs, and would be toolable. Math.random() does obviously not fit the bill. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
