Em seg 28 abr 2014, às 00:55:12, André Pönitz escreveu: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 01:37:33PM -0700, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em dom 27 abr 2014, às 12:55:58, Peter Kümmel escreveu: > > > Having imperative code on the JS side is also the root of the rejection > > > of > > > QML for many C++ developers. If QML would have been just a improved .ui > > > nobody would have complained. > > > > We'd end up with one of the problems of CSS which is that you can't do > > calculations in the bindings. I can't do > > > > width: 50% - 10em > > > > The moment you start adding some math, you need stuff like Math.random() > > and you end up again in JS. > > Not true. Some (basic) math fits the "declarative" needs, and would > be toolable. Math.random() does obviously not fit the bill.
Math.floor() then. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
